Anya Proops addresses the above question, prompted by the recent revelations about the US Prism programme, in an article in today’s Guardian. She discusses the main legal constraints on surveillance in the UK – Article 8, the Data Protection Act, and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act. And she even manages a name check for Panopticon – both the Benthamite version, and this blog. The article is at page 32 of today’s print edition, and it’s online here. It’s already attracted a lot of attention, both by way of comments on the online version, and on Twitter.

Tags
Click 'Tags' to show or hide the tag cloud.article 6 article 8 Article 8 ECHR Article 10 ECHR CCTV confidentiality damages database data protection data sharing DNA EIR employment monitoring employment vetting environmental information First-tier tribunal FOIA Google High Court ICO powers Information Tribunal internet judicial review legal professional privilege national security personal data privacy Procedure public authorities public interest RIPA section 14 FOIA section 27 FOIA section 35 FOIA section 36 FOIA section 40 FOIA section 41 FOIA section 42 FOIA section 43 FOIA section 44 FOIA surveillance Upper Tribunal veto vexatious requests whether information heldBlog maintained by:
Search
Subscribe
Law Reports
Links
- 11KBW Resources
- Act Now Training
- Amberhawk
- Article 29 Working Party
- Australian Privacy Commissioner
- Centre for Freedom of Information
- Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- European Data Protection Supervisor
- FOI Man
- FOI News
- freedominfo.org
- Ibrahim Hassan
- Information Commissioner’s Office
- Information Law Practice
- Information Tribunal
- InfoSec
- Ministry of Justice
- National Association of Data Protection Officers
- New Zealand Privacy Commissioner
- Northumbria University Information Rights LLM
- Open Secrets blog
- Out-Law website
- Scottish Information Commissioner
- Surveillance and Society
- UCL Constitution Unit
- UK Freedom of Information Blog
- Virtual Shadows
- Your Right to Know Blog
Disclaimer
This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
How can this level of state surveillance be legal?
June 19th, 2013Comments are closed.
11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2009
Terms & Conditions | © 11KBW 2009